← My Water · Print / save as PDF
HAY GULCH DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3300504 · 1 · LA PLATA RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:31 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1888-02-08 — 153rd most senior of the 364 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: P M DAVIS DITCH (1886-07-24). Immediately behind: GCC RESERVOIR (1888-02-08).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13918.0 | 1888-02-08 | 1898-01-12 | 10.47 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRCOMINDDOMAUG | #5 |
| 14431.0 | 1889-07-05 | 1898-01-12 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | #9 |
| 17544.17297 | 1897-05-10 | 1915-06-23 | 3.75 | 0.0 | C | IRR | #35 |
| 25371.0 | 1919-06-19 | 1966-03-21 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | 65-19 |
| 57708.0 | 2007-12-31 | 2007-12-31 | 0.0 | 1.7 | C | STOCOMINDDOMAUG | |
| 60538.0 | 2015-09-30 | 2015-12-31 | 1.7 | 0.0 | C | STO |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 4,778 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 3,315 AF — 69% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 5,480 | 13th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 3 | 365 | 18.3 |
| 2012 | 4,781 | 9th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 186 | 366 | 16.8 |
| 2013 | 5,177 | 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 224 | 365 | 16.4 |
| 2014 | 5,286 | 12th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 15 | 365 | 16.3 |
| 2015 | 5,885 | 15th lowest of 15 · 123% of median | 17 | 365 | 18.0 |
| 2016 | 4,902 | 10th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 16 | 366 | 18.8 |
| 2017 | 5,746 | 14th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 34 | 365 | 17.1 |
| 2018 | 3,826 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 31 | 365 | 14.5 |
| 2019 | 4,584 | 7th lowest of 15 · 96% of median | 33 | 342 | 18.4 |
| 2020 | 3,831 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 37 | 366 | 17.4 |
| 2021 | 3,996 | 5th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 34 | 365 | 13.5 |
| 2022 | 3,969 | 4th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 37 | 365 | 16.5 |
| 2023 | 4,060 | 6th lowest of 15 · 85% of median | 25 | 365 | 15.0 |
| 2024 | 4,778 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 33 | 366 | 16.8 |
| 2025 | 3,315 | 1st lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 32 | 304 | 16.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.