← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ISGAR IRRIGATION SYSTEM

Structure dossier · WDID 3300616 · 1 · LA PLATA RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:46 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1925-12-31260th most senior of the 364 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BOGLE NO 1 WELL (1973-09-10). Immediately behind: SHALAKO WELL NO 3 (1942-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
45290.277581925-12-311974-12-31 3.00.0 CIRRFIS

Recorded use (last 11 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 342 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1985, came in at 366 AF — 107% of that, and 7th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1975 462 11th lowest of 11 · 135% of median 195 2.6
1976 280 3rd lowest of 11 · 82% of median 210 2.2
1977 46 1st lowest of 11 · 14% of median 209 0.2
1978 203 2nd lowest of 11 · 59% of median 176 1.9
1979 396 9th lowest of 11 · 116% of median 170 3.1
1980 381 8th lowest of 11 · 111% of median 130 2.5
1981 312 4th lowest of 11 · 91% of median 146 2.4
1982 330 5th lowest of 11 · 96% of median 160 1.5
1983 436 10th lowest of 11 · 128% of median 146 2.2
1984 342 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median 159 1.5
1985 366 7th lowest of 11 · 107% of median 151 1.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 1852 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 83% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-1985 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.