← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

RATLIFF AND ROOT DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3400554 · 1 · MANCOS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:46 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1875-05-15171st most senior of the 495 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LEE AND BURKE DITCH (1874-07-01). Immediately behind: WEBBER DITCH (1875-05-15).

Decreed rights (20)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
9266.01875-05-151893-04-28 4.250.0 CIRR M-2
9632.01876-05-151893-04-28 0.50.0 CIRR M-3
9997.01877-05-151893-04-28 0.250.0 CIRR M-4
10362.01878-05-151893-04-28 1.950.0 CIRREVP M-6
11464.01881-05-211893-04-28 1.390.0 CIRR M-11
11823.01882-05-151893-04-28 0.230.0 CIRR M-13
11828.01882-05-201893-04-28 0.00.0 CIRR M-14
12188.01883-05-151893-04-28 0.00.0 CIRR M-17
12195.01883-05-221893-04-28 0.00.0 CIRR M-18
12196.01883-05-231893-04-28 0.660.0 CIRR M-19
12571.01884-06-011893-04-28 0.00.0 CIRR M-21
12919.01885-05-151893-04-28 0.4170.0 CIRR M-25
12975.01885-07-101893-04-28 0.00.0 CIRR M-26
13315.01886-06-151893-04-28 2.580.0 CIRR M-30
13345.01886-07-151893-04-28 2.080.0 CIRR M-31
14380.01889-05-151893-04-28 1.00.0 CIRR M-36
14411.01889-06-151893-04-28 16.490.0 CIRR M-37
15504.01892-06-121893-04-28 2.50.0 CIRR M-46
30671.01933-12-221963-03-22 4.00.0 CDOMSTK 62-18
36712.01950-07-071963-03-22 1.50.0 CIRR 62-50

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 4,921 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 3,715 AF — 76% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 5,345 11th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 365 25.5
2012 4,391 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 366 17.8
2013 3,440 3rd lowest of 15 · 70% of median 365 16.0
2014 4,921 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 365 31.5
2015 5,158 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 356 26.6
2016 5,398 13th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 366 22.4
2017 5,434 14th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 365 23.4
2018 2,974 2nd lowest of 15 · 60% of median 365 12.6
2019 5,180 10th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 365 24.6
2020 4,016 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 366 22.2
2021 2,605 1st lowest of 15 · 53% of median 365 16.5
2022 3,469 4th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 365 20.0
2023 5,470 15th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 365 20.0
2024 5,348 12th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 366 24.6
2025 3,715 5th lowest of 15 · 76% of median 304 18.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 20 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 22475 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 1949-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.