← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WEBBER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3400576 · 1 · MANCOS RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:43 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1875-05-15 — 172nd most senior of the 495 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RATLIFF AND ROOT DITCH (1875-05-15). Immediately behind: JACKSON GULCH INLET CNL (1876-05-15).
Decreed rights (18)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9266.0 | 1875-05-15 | 1893-04-28 | 1.25 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-2 |
| 10362.0 | 1878-05-15 | 1893-04-28 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-6 |
| 11464.0 | 1881-05-21 | 1893-04-28 | 0.69 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-11 |
| 11823.0 | 1882-05-15 | 1893-04-28 | 5.87 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-13 |
| 11828.0 | 1882-05-20 | 1893-04-28 | 2.25 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-14 |
| 12174.0 | 1883-05-01 | 1893-04-28 | 0.25 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-16 |
| 12188.0 | 1883-05-15 | 1893-04-28 | 7.08 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-17 |
| 12975.0 | 1885-07-10 | 1893-04-28 | 1.167 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-26 |
| 13042.0 | 1885-09-15 | 1893-04-28 | 1.667 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-28 |
| 13284.0 | 1886-05-15 | 1893-04-28 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-29 |
| 13315.0 | 1886-06-15 | 1893-04-28 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-30 |
| 14380.0 | 1889-05-15 | 1893-04-28 | 2.58 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-36 |
| 14411.0 | 1889-06-15 | 1893-04-28 | 0.43 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-37 |
| 15504.0 | 1892-06-12 | 1893-04-28 | 0.83 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-46 |
| 19083.0 | 1902-04-01 | 1933-12-18 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-54 |
| 24957.0 | 1918-05-01 | 1933-12-18 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | M-57 |
| 30671.0 | 1933-12-22 | 1963-03-22 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | DOMSTKOTH | 62-19 |
| 30801.0 | 1934-05-01 | 1963-03-22 | 15.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 62-41 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 4,093 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 3,265 AF — 80% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 6,082 | 15th lowest of 15 · 149% of median | 365 | 34.0 |
| 2012 | 4,222 | 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median | 356 | 26.7 |
| 2013 | 2,817 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 69% of median | 365 | 23.5 |
| 2014 | 4,093 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 365 | 26.4 |
| 2015 | 5,353 | 12th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | 365 | 24.9 |
| 2016 | 4,604 | 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 366 | 31.1 |
| 2017 | 5,379 | 13th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | 365 | 32.6 |
| 2018 | 1,964 | 1st lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 365 | 12.1 |
| 2019 | 5,407 | 14th lowest of 15 · 132% of median | 365 | 29.6 |
| 2020 | 3,364 | 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 366 | 26.0 |
| 2021 | 2,237 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 55% of median | 365 | 19.7 |
| 2022 | 3,714 | 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 365 | 31.5 |
| 2023 | 4,991 | 11th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 365 | 25.0 |
| 2024 | 3,761 | 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median | 366 | 23.3 |
| 2025 | 3,265 | 4th lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 304 | 20.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.