← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WEBBER DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3400576 · 1 · MANCOS RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:43 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (f6d7fdc) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1875-05-15172nd most senior of the 495 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RATLIFF AND ROOT DITCH (1875-05-15). Immediately behind: JACKSON GULCH INLET CNL (1876-05-15).

Decreed rights (18)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
9266.01875-05-151893-04-28 1.250.0 CIRR M-2
10362.01878-05-151893-04-28 0.50.0 CIRR M-6
11464.01881-05-211893-04-28 0.690.0 CIRR M-11
11823.01882-05-151893-04-28 5.870.0 CIRR M-13
11828.01882-05-201893-04-28 2.250.0 CIRR M-14
12174.01883-05-011893-04-28 0.250.0 CIRR M-16
12188.01883-05-151893-04-28 7.080.0 CIRR M-17
12975.01885-07-101893-04-28 1.1670.0 CIRR M-26
13042.01885-09-151893-04-28 1.6670.0 CIRR M-28
13284.01886-05-151893-04-28 0.50.0 CIRR M-29
13315.01886-06-151893-04-28 1.00.0 CIRR M-30
14380.01889-05-151893-04-28 2.580.0 CIRR M-36
14411.01889-06-151893-04-28 0.430.0 CIRR M-37
15504.01892-06-121893-04-28 0.830.0 CIRR M-46
19083.01902-04-011933-12-18 5.00.0 CIRR M-54
24957.01918-05-011933-12-18 1.00.0 CIRR M-57
30671.01933-12-221963-03-22 5.00.0 CDOMSTKOTH 62-19
30801.01934-05-011963-03-22 15.00.0 CIRR 62-41

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 4,093 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 3,265 AF — 80% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 6,082 15th lowest of 15 · 149% of median 365 34.0
2012 4,222 9th lowest of 15 · 103% of median 356 26.7
2013 2,817 3rd lowest of 15 · 69% of median 365 23.5
2014 4,093 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 365 26.4
2015 5,353 12th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 365 24.9
2016 4,604 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 366 31.1
2017 5,379 13th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 365 32.6
2018 1,964 1st lowest of 15 · 48% of median 365 12.1
2019 5,407 14th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 365 29.6
2020 3,364 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 366 26.0
2021 2,237 2nd lowest of 15 · 55% of median 365 19.7
2022 3,714 6th lowest of 15 · 91% of median 365 31.5
2023 4,991 11th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 365 25.0
2024 3,761 7th lowest of 15 · 92% of median 366 23.3
2025 3,265 4th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 304 20.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.