← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MEDANO SAND CR D

Structure dossier · WDID 3500541 · 1 · SAND CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 00:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1908-07-0183rd most senior of the 709 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SUPPLY D 4 (1908-04-05). Immediately behind: ZAPATO D 3 (1909-02-19).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21366.01908-07-011915-01-04 40.00.0 CIRR 69

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 805 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1952 5,246 15th lowest of 15 · 652% of median 83 45.0
1970 805 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 29 25.0
1973 1,359 12th lowest of 15 · 169% of median 63 20.0
1975 2,559 14th lowest of 15 · 318% of median 62 30.0
1982 294 4th lowest of 15 · 36% of median 38 4.0
1983 1,051 11th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 54 10.0
1984 1,031 9th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 14 40.0
1985 555 6th lowest of 15 · 69% of median 29 10.0
1986 694 7th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 36 10.0
1987 1,706 13th lowest of 15 · 212% of median 59 20.0
1994 446 5th lowest of 15 · 55% of median 16 15.0
1998 1,034 10th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 102 8.0
1999 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 3 0.0
2000 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 10 0.0
2021 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 599 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 4% of the irrigation seasons in 1952-2021 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.