← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NEWTON D 2
Structure dossier · WDID 3500560 · 1 · UTE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:12 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1867-05-01 — 32nd most senior of the 709 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MILL D (1867-05-01). Immediately behind: NORTH SWAMP D (1867-05-01).
Decreed rights (12)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6330.0 | 1867-05-01 | 1900-11-26 | 4.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 61/2 |
| 8157.0 | 1872-05-01 | 1900-11-26 | 9.33 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 181/2 |
| 8917.0 | 1874-05-31 | 1899-12-15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 27 |
| 9588.0 | 1876-04-01 | 1899-12-15 | 1.67 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 11109.0 | 1880-05-31 | 1899-12-15 | 1.34 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 35 |
| 13818.0 | 1887-10-31 | 1899-12-15 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 39 |
| 13971.0 | 1888-04-01 | 1899-12-15 | 1.33 | 0.0 | C | IRR | |
| 21376.0 | 1908-07-11 | 1915-01-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 71 |
| 22156.0 | 1910-08-30 | 1915-01-04 | 47.1 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 79 |
| 22320.0 | 1911-02-10 | 1915-01-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 81 |
| 22324.0 | 1911-02-14 | 1915-01-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 82 |
| 22377.0 | 1911-04-08 | 1915-01-04 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRR | 95 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,884 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2021, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 232 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 12% of median | 40 | 5.2 |
| 1997 | 5,717 | 15th lowest of 15 · 304% of median | 182 | 22.2 |
| 1998 | 3,537 | 13th lowest of 15 · 188% of median | 188 | 18.6 |
| 1999 | 1,387 | 5th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 158 | 8.8 |
| 2000 | 100 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 5% of median | 25 | 3.0 |
| 2001 | 3,870 | 14th lowest of 15 · 205% of median | 198 | 23.4 |
| 2002 | 446 | 4th lowest of 15 · 24% of median | 76 | 5.9 |
| 2003 | 2,444 | 9th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | 135 | 22.3 |
| 2004 | 1,448 | 6th lowest of 15 · 77% of median | 117 | 17.2 |
| 2005 | 2,524 | 11th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 165 | 13.4 |
| 2006 | 1,535 | 7th lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 179 | 6.3 |
| 2007 | 1,884 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 159 | 10.5 |
| 2008 | 2,520 | 10th lowest of 15 · 134% of median | 170 | 11.7 |
| 2020 | 3,075 | 12th lowest of 15 · 163% of median | 220 | 14.7 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.