← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

ZEN SPRING NO 01

Structure dossier · WDID 3500709 · 4 · PIONEER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:18 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1992-04-13669th most senior of the 709 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: 91CW020 WELL NO 01 (1981-02-27). Immediately behind: ZEN SPRING NO 02 (1992-04-13).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
51968.01992-04-131992-12-31 0.0330.0 CDOM

Recorded use (last 8 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 16 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2002, came in at 7 AF — 45% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1994 17 5th lowest of 8 · 110% of median 88 0.1
1995 53 7th lowest of 8 · 342% of median 208 0.1
1996 27 6th lowest of 8 · 174% of median 212 0.1
1997 55 8th lowest of 8 · 355% of median 199 0.5
1998 13 3rd lowest of 8 · 84% of median 194 0.0
1999 14 4th lowest of 8 · 90% of median 222 0.0
2000 5 1st lowest of 8 · 32% of median 74 0.0
2002 7 2nd lowest of 8 · 45% of median 213 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.