← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BOBO DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3600535 · 1 · BLUE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:11 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1949-03-01 — 424th most senior of the 1247 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GRIGGS RESERVOIR (1948-06-24). Immediately behind: RIVER CENTER HDGT & POND (1949-03-01).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36219.0 | 1949-03-01 | 1952-03-10 | 6.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRFISFIRDOM | 381 |
| 36738.0 | 1950-08-02 | 1952-03-10 | 1.63 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 397 |
| 51499.42004 | 1965-01-01 | 1991-12-31 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | RECFISWLD | |
| 63001.0 | 2022-06-28 | 2022-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | A | IRRRECFISOTH | 381 |
| 63001.0 | 2022-06-28 | 2022-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFISOTH | 381 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 482 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 533 AF — 111% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1,481 | 13th lowest of 15 · 307% of median | — | 173 | 5.2 |
| 2009 | 1,551 | 14th lowest of 15 · 322% of median | — | 176 | 5.9 |
| 2010 | 1,562 | 15th lowest of 15 · 324% of median | — | 178 | 8.7 |
| 2012 | 482 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 182 | 4.6 |
| 2014 | 882 | 12th lowest of 15 · 183% of median | — | 181 | 5.2 |
| 2015 | 711 | 11th lowest of 15 · 148% of median | — | 206 | 3.6 |
| 2016 | 426 | 4th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | — | 168 | 2.7 |
| 2017 | 472 | 6th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | — | 160 | 2.7 |
| 2018 | 376 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 78% of median | — | 180 | 2.3 |
| 2019 | 350 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 73% of median | — | 160 | 2.0 |
| 2020 | 478 | 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | — | 106 | 6.8 |
| 2021 | 460 | 5th lowest of 15 · 95% of median | — | 242 | 2.5 |
| 2022 | 71 | 1st lowest of 15 · 15% of median | — | 264 | 0.5 |
| 2023 | 558 | 10th lowest of 15 · 116% of median | — | 153 | 3.8 |
| 2024 | 533 | 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | — | 168 | 2.4 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.