← My Water · Print / save as PDF
INDEPENDENT BLUE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3600671 · 1 · BLUE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:30 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1889-06-01 — 92nd most senior of the 1247 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CLANCY DITCH (1889-06-01). Immediately behind: LAWSON DITCH (1889-06-01).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14397.0 | 1889-06-01 | 1910-03-02 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 59 |
| 14884.0 | 1890-10-01 | 1910-03-02 | 0.65 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 75 |
| 22965.22564 | 1911-10-12 | 1913-10-13 | 1.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 194 |
| 32075.2578 | 1920-08-01 | 1952-03-10 | 0.2 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 329 |
| 32075.31166 | 1935-05-01 | 1952-03-10 | 18.8 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 339 |
| 35929.0 | 1948-05-15 | 1952-03-10 | 8.95 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 379 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,577 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,582 AF — 100% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1,182 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 75% of median | — | 105 | 8.2 |
| 2009 | 1,421 | 6th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | — | 139 | 9.4 |
| 2010 | 1,248 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 79% of median | — | 87 | 11.4 |
| 2012 | 1,360 | 4th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | — | 109 | 8.9 |
| 2014 | 426 | 1st lowest of 15 · 27% of median | — | 37 | 6.7 |
| 2015 | 1,969 | 10th lowest of 15 · 125% of median | — | 140 | 11.2 |
| 2016 | 3,629 | 15th lowest of 15 · 230% of median | 2,671 | 155 | 22.8 |
| 2017 | 1,535 | 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | — | 90 | 12.9 |
| 2018 | 1,577 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 99 | 14.0 |
| 2019 | 1,404 | 5th lowest of 15 · 89% of median | — | 125 | 8.2 |
| 2020 | 2,232 | 14th lowest of 15 · 142% of median | — | 176 | 12.0 |
| 2021 | 2,129 | 11th lowest of 15 · 135% of median | — | 169 | 13.1 |
| 2022 | 2,196 | 13th lowest of 15 · 139% of median | — | 156 | 18.8 |
| 2023 | 2,144 | 12th lowest of 15 · 136% of median | — | 126 | 14.0 |
| 2024 | 1,582 | 9th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 134 | 10.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.