Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CURRAN NO 2 DITCH DIV NO 1
Structure dossier · WDID 3600806 · 1 · ROCK CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:32 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1919-07-20 — 366th most senior of the 1247 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GOOD WELL NO 1 (1919-05-12). Immediately behind: CURRAN NO 2 DITCH DIV NO 2 (1919-07-20).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32075.25402 | 1919-07-20 | 1952-03-10 | 1.374 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 325 |
| 56536.0 | 2004-10-15 | 2004-12-31 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | FISFIRWLD | 325 |
Legal record & documents
4 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
21CW3018, 14CW3059, 04CW0244.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
21CW3018 | 1 | 2004-12-31 | S |
14CW3059 | 1 | 2004-12-31 | S |
04CW0244 | 2 | 2004-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 11 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 150 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 150 AF — 100% of that, and 6th lowest of the 11 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 95 | 1st lowest of 11 · 63% of median | 77 | 0.9 |
| 2015 | 147 | 5th lowest of 11 · 98% of median | 113 | 1.0 |
| 2016 | 215 | 11th lowest of 11 · 143% of median | 104 | 1.3 |
| 2017 | 176 | 8th lowest of 11 · 117% of median | 103 | 0.9 |
| 2018 | 136 | 2nd lowest of 11 · 91% of median | 90 | 0.9 |
| 2019 | 136 | 2nd lowest of 11 · 91% of median | 87 | 1.4 |
| 2020 | 168 | 7th lowest of 11 · 112% of median | 93 | 1.2 |
| 2021 | 191 | 9th lowest of 11 · 127% of median | 142 | 1.3 |
| 2022 | 199 | 10th lowest of 11 · 133% of median | 132 | 1.1 |
| 2023 | 145 | 4th lowest of 11 · 97% of median | 85 | 0.9 |
| 2024 | 150 | 6th lowest of 11 · 100% of median | 85 | 1.8 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 11 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 1111 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 50% of the irrigation seasons in 2014-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.