← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

VIDLER TUNNEL UNIT HDGT C

Structure dossier · WDID 3601057 · 1 · PERU CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1893-05-03125th most senior of the 1247 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: VIDLER TUNNEL UNIT HDGT B (1893-05-03). Immediately behind: VIDLER TUNNEL UNIT HDGT D (1893-05-03).

Decreed rights (13)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
15829.01893-05-031910-03-02 0.00.0 CDOMAUG 90
19875.01904-06-011910-03-02 0.00.0 CDOMAUG 156
22965.225531911-10-011913-10-13 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDDOM 194
23296.2241911-05-011914-10-12 0.00.0 CMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMWLD 197
29022.253721919-06-201930-01-09 0.00.0 CMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMWLD 214
30184.168011895-12-311937-10-26 0.00.0 CMUNCOMINDRECFISFIRDOMWLD 220, 72
30184.235611914-07-051937-10-26 0.00.0 CDOMAUG 230
30951.01934-09-281937-10-26 0.00.0 CIRRINDDOM 249
32075.184441900-07-011952-03-10 0.00.0 CDOMAUG 278
32075.235611914-07-051952-03-10 0.00.0 CDOMAUG 316
32075.25781920-08-011952-03-10 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMINDDOM 329
33289.01941-02-211952-03-10 0.00.0 CIRRMUNCOMDOM 351
40020.01959-07-281979-03-19 0.40.0 CIRRMUNINDDOMSTK

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 13 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record absent no diversion records cached
record continuity unknown no record span to measure against
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.