← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

COPPER MTN WHEELER GULCH PIPELINE

Structure dossier · WDID 3601087 · 7 · WEST TENMILE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:45 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1941-03-10388th most senior of the 1247 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: COPPER MTN WEST LAKE PIPELINE 2 (1941-03-10). Immediately behind: COPPER MTN BEELER LAKE PIPELINE (1941-03-10).

Decreed rights (4)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
33306.01941-03-101952-03-10 1.50.0 CIRR 353
50109.01987-03-121982-12-31 3.20.0 CRCH
60994.02016-12-292016-12-31 0.00.0 ASNO
60994.02016-12-292016-12-31 0.00.0 CSNO

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 644 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 608 AF — 94% of that, and 4th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2015 142 1st lowest of 10 · 22% of median 61 1.3
2016 798 7th lowest of 10 · 124% of median 366 1.6
2017 809 8th lowest of 10 · 126% of median 365 2.4
2018 595 3rd lowest of 10 · 92% of median 365 1.6
2019 830 9th lowest of 10 · 129% of median 365 3.2
2020 841 10th lowest of 10 · 131% of median 366 2.4
2021 665 6th lowest of 10 · 103% of median 365 2.4
2022 622 5th lowest of 10 · 97% of median 365 1.6
2023 490 2nd lowest of 10 · 76% of median 365 2.4
2024 608 4th lowest of 10 · 94% of median 305 3.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.