Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
CON-HOOSIER EAST HOOSIER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3604689 · 1 · HOOSIER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 05:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1929-08-05 — 306th most senior of the 1247 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SWANSON ORO GRANDE DITCH (1922-06-30). Immediately behind: CON-HOOSIER - EAST HOOSIER DITCH CLAIM 1 (1929-08-05).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30184.29071 | 1929-08-05 | 1937-10-26 | 40.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDDOM | 87-240 |
| 35927.0 | 1948-05-13 | 1952-03-10 | 50.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDFIRDOMOTH | 374-146 |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
CA2782, CA1806, CA1883.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA2782 | 1 | 1952-03-10 | S |
CA1806 | 1 | 1952-03-10 | S |
CA1883 | 1 | 1937-10-26 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,501 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,804 AF — 120% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 60 | 0.0 |
| 2011 | 778 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 52% of median | 302 | 17.6 |
| 2012 | 778 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 52% of median | 152 | 17.6 |
| 2013 | 1,628 | 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 365 | 24.0 |
| 2014 | 2,304 | 15th lowest of 15 · 154% of median | 365 | 30.5 |
| 2015 | 1,709 | 10th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 304 | 38.0 |
| 2016 | 1,501 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 244 | 23.4 |
| 2017 | 1,794 | 11th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 365 | 25.1 |
| 2018 | 1,001 | 4th lowest of 15 · 67% of median | 304 | 12.0 |
| 2019 | 2,131 | 14th lowest of 15 · 142% of median | 153 | 25.3 |
| 2020 | 1,116 | 6th lowest of 15 · 74% of median | 214 | 17.9 |
| 2021 | 1,221 | 7th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 365 | 20.5 |
| 2022 | 1,069 | 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median | 365 | 12.1 |
| 2023 | 2,001 | 13th lowest of 15 · 133% of median | 365 | 15.1 |
| 2024 | 1,804 | 12th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 305 | 33.4 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 4228 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2010-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.