← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CASTLE CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3700537 · 1 · CASTLE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1918-11-19388th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CASTLE DITCH (1918-06-30). Immediately behind: MILLER CORRALL DITCH (1919-05-01).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30894.251591918-11-191936-10-03 0.40360.0 CIRR 434

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 64 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2017, came in at 96 AF — 150% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1997 52 7th lowest of 15 · 81% of median 31 1.0
2001 28 5th lowest of 15 · 44% of median 143 0.1
2002 4 3rd lowest of 15 · 6% of median 12 0.2
2003 48 6th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 17 1.5
2004 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2005 186 12th lowest of 15 · 291% of median 61 1.6
2006 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2007 64 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 26 1.3
2008 92 9th lowest of 15 · 144% of median 23 2.1
2009 655 15th lowest of 15 · 1023% of median 88 4.0
2010 516 14th lowest of 15 · 806% of median 66 4.0
2011 226 13th lowest of 15 · 353% of median 45 4.0
2014 168 11th lowest of 15 · 262% of median 48 1.8
2015 21 4th lowest of 15 · 33% of median 49 0.3
2017 96 10th lowest of 15 · 150% of median 61 1.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.