Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
FOOSHEE DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3700602 · 1 · TALMADGE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1889-05-10 — 90th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PINEY VALLEY RANCH DITCH (1889-04-05). Immediately behind: EAGLE RIVER DIVERSION PT (1889-05-10).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14375.0 | 1889-05-10 | 1889-12-17 | 1.8 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOMSTK | 80 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 91 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1986, came in at 118 AF — 130% of that, and 9th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1952 | 233 | 14th lowest of 15 · 256% of median | 108 | 1.1 |
| 1953 | 65 | 6th lowest of 15 · 71% of median | 62 | 0.6 |
| 1954 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1955 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 1956 | 151 | 11th lowest of 15 · 166% of median | 137 | 0.7 |
| 1957 | 158 | 12th lowest of 15 · 174% of median | 109 | 0.8 |
| 1958 | 179 | 13th lowest of 15 · 197% of median | 118 | 0.9 |
| 1974 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 1975 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1977 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1978 | 91 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 153 | 0.3 |
| 1979 | 91 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 153 | 0.3 |
| 1981 | 131 | 10th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | 67 | 1.0 |
| 1984 | 242 | 15th lowest of 15 · 266% of median | 123 | 1.0 |
| 1986 | 118 | 9th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | 76 | 1.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.