← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

GRAHAM NO 2 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3700617 · 1 · STONE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:28 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1890-12-15278th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GRAHAM NO 1 DITCH (1890-12-15). Immediately behind: EAGLE-VAIL MUN SYS ALT 1 (1890-12-15).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21707.149591890-12-151909-07-26 2.50.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 276A
30894.253531919-06-011936-10-03 3.310.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 438

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 217 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1994, came in at 278 AF — 128% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1952 549 15th lowest of 15 · 253% of median 131 5.5
1953 482 14th lowest of 15 · 222% of median 117 3.4
1954 108 6th lowest of 15 · 50% of median 83 0.8
1955 152 7th lowest of 15 · 70% of median 86 1.1
1956 249 10th lowest of 15 · 115% of median 105 1.3
1957 290 13th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 123 1.2
1958 217 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 132 1.3
1974 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
1975 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1977 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1978 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1981 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
1992 284 12th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 184 0.9
1993 238 9th lowest of 15 · 110% of median 144 0.9
1994 278 11th lowest of 15 · 128% of median 157 0.9

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.