← My Water · Print / save as PDF
GRUNDELL BROS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3700620 · 1 · GYPSUM CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:33 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1882-05-12 — 14th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WHITE DITCH (1882-05-01). Immediately behind: MCBRAYER & FENNER DITCH (1883-03-01).
Decreed rights (4)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11820.0 | 1882-05-12 | 1889-12-17 | 2.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFIRDOM | 6 |
| 14463.0 | 1889-08-06 | 1889-12-17 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFIRDOM | 87 |
| 23802.2374 | 1914-12-31 | 1915-06-07 | 2.07 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFIRDOM | 126EX, 6EX |
| 52960.52838 | 1994-08-31 | 1995-12-31 | 0.0 | 3.0 | C | IRRCOMRECFISFIRDOMAUGWLD |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,043 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 657 AF — 63% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 380 | 1st lowest of 15 · 36% of median | — | 144 | 2.0 |
| 2011 | 1,840 | 14th lowest of 15 · 176% of median | — | 189 | 9.3 |
| 2012 | 595 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 57% of median | — | 239 | 2.4 |
| 2013 | 1,043 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 190 | 6.8 |
| 2014 | 1,798 | 12th lowest of 15 · 172% of median | — | 207 | 7.5 |
| 2015 | 1,898 | 15th lowest of 15 · 182% of median | 661 | 200 | 7.2 |
| 2016 | 1,715 | 11th lowest of 15 · 164% of median | 657 | 210 | 6.0 |
| 2017 | 1,671 | 10th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 657 | 207 | 6.9 |
| 2018 | 1,649 | 9th lowest of 15 · 158% of median | 657 | 207 | 6.1 |
| 2019 | 1,799 | 13th lowest of 15 · 172% of median | 657 | 184 | 8.8 |
| 2020 | 837 | 7th lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 657 | 184 | 4.9 |
| 2021 | 657 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 657 | 184 | 1.8 |
| 2022 | 657 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 657 | 184 | 1.8 |
| 2023 | 657 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 657 | 184 | 1.8 |
| 2024 | 657 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 63% of median | 657 | 184 | 1.8 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.