Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NOTTINGHAM & PUDER DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3700736 · 1 · EAGLE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1888-04-01 — 159th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HURD DITCH (1888-04-01). Immediately behind: FROEMMING SPRING (1888-04-01).
Decreed rights (16)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16251.13971 | 1888-04-01 | 1901-03-05 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | 146 |
| 16251.14154 | 1888-10-01 | 1901-03-05 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | 147 |
| 16251.14337 | 1889-04-02 | 1901-03-05 | 10.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOMAUGEVP | 148 |
| 25672.2315 | 1913-05-20 | 1920-05-21 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | 350 |
| 30894.14702 | 1890-04-02 | 1936-10-03 | 2.63 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOMAUGEVP | 377 |
| 30894.19164 | 1902-06-21 | 1936-10-03 | 2.28 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOMAUGEVP | 393 |
| 30894.20299 | 1905-07-30 | 1936-10-03 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOMAUGEVP | 399 |
| 30894.22736 | 1912-04-01 | 1936-10-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | 415 |
| 30894.2388 | 1915-05-20 | 1936-10-03 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | 424 |
| 38753.33737 | 1942-05-15 | 1958-07-23 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | 528 |
| 38753.35914 | 1948-04-30 | 1958-07-23 | 0.5 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOMAUGEVP | 530 |
| 38753.37406 | 1952-05-31 | 1958-07-23 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | 535 |
| 38753.37911 | 1953-10-18 | 1958-07-23 | 4.235 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNAUGEVP | 527 |
| 44301.0 | 1971-04-17 | 1971-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | |
| 44925.30559 | 1933-09-01 | 1973-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | |
| 53831.0 | 1997-05-20 | 1997-12-31 | 0.0 | 5.0 | C | MUNFIROTH |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 342 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 227 AF — 66% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 1,003 | 13th lowest of 15 · 293% of median | 160 | 3.6 |
| 1994 | 996 | 12th lowest of 15 · 291% of median | 161 | 4.0 |
| 1995 | 940 | 10th lowest of 15 · 275% of median | 159 | 3.0 |
| 1996 | 2,598 | 15th lowest of 15 · 760% of median | 132 | 10.0 |
| 1997 | 2,539 | 14th lowest of 15 · 742% of median | 129 | 10.0 |
| 1998 | 861 | 9th lowest of 15 · 252% of median | 147 | 4.0 |
| 2004 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2005 | 299 | 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 160 | 2.0 |
| 2009 | 289 | 6th lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 144 | 4.0 |
| 2011 | 342 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 82 | 5.2 |
| 2012 | 959 | 11th lowest of 15 · 280% of median | 137 | 6.7 |
| 2013 | 134 | 4th lowest of 15 · 39% of median | 137 | 1.0 |
| 2020 | 1 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 6 | 0.8 |
| 2021 | 53 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 16% of median | 54 | 0.5 |
| 2024 | 227 | 5th lowest of 15 · 66% of median | 110 | 1.1 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.