← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WARREN DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3700848 · 1 · EAGLE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:27 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1885-04-20 — 46th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JOHNSON DITCH AP (1885-04-15). Immediately behind: GROFF DITCH (1885-04-30).
Decreed rights (6)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12894.0 | 1885-04-20 | 1889-12-17 | 3.7 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 32 |
| 14527.0 | 1889-10-09 | 1889-12-17 | 2.4 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 95 |
| 14527.0 | 1889-10-09 | 1889-12-17 | 1.6 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNRECFIRDOMAUG | 96 |
| 20427.18901 | 1901-10-01 | 1907-06-04 | 0.936 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 235 |
| 30894.26571 | 1922-10-01 | 1936-10-03 | 11.83 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 450 |
| 38753.37375 | 1952-04-30 | 1958-07-23 | 15.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 534 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,626 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 64 AF — 4% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 5,873 | 15th lowest of 15 · 361% of median | — | 365 | 17.0 |
| 2008 | 3,094 | 14th lowest of 15 · 190% of median | — | 305 | 14.1 |
| 2009 | 2,763 | 13th lowest of 15 · 170% of median | — | 170 | 16.9 |
| 2010 | 2,337 | 11th lowest of 15 · 144% of median | — | 175 | 15.8 |
| 2011 | 2,249 | 10th lowest of 15 · 138% of median | — | 176 | 14.0 |
| 2012 | 2,762 | 12th lowest of 15 · 170% of median | — | 192 | 16.3 |
| 2013 | 1,626 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 147 | 12.0 |
| 2014 | 901 | 6th lowest of 15 · 55% of median | — | 182 | 4.5 |
| 2015 | 812 | 5th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | — | 150 | 3.8 |
| 2016 | 775 | 4th lowest of 15 · 48% of median | — | 177 | 4.3 |
| 2017 | 543 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 33% of median | — | 186 | 2.5 |
| 2018 | 917 | 7th lowest of 15 · 56% of median | — | 197 | 3.5 |
| 2019 | 1,741 | 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median | — | 191 | 8.6 |
| 2020 | 135 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 8% of median | — | 180 | 0.9 |
| 2024 | 64 | 1st lowest of 15 · 4% of median | 64 | 214 | 0.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.