← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

EAGLE-VAIL MUN WATER SYS

Structure dossier · WDID 3701084 · 1 · STONE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:21 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1886-06-11275th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WILLOW CREEK DITCH (1886-06-11). Immediately behind: STONE CR RES AND DITCH (1886-06-11).

Decreed rights (6)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
21707.133111886-06-111909-07-26 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 276
21707.149591890-12-151909-07-26 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 276A
30894.253531919-06-011936-10-03 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 437
30894.253531919-06-011936-10-03 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 438
30894.282141927-04-011936-10-03 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM 469
46020.447921972-08-201976-12-31 3.1682.332 CIRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM

How good is our record of it?

Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 6 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record absent no diversion records cached
record continuity unknown no record span to measure against
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.