← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

WARREN E WURTS DITCH EXT

Structure dossier · WDID 3701290 · 1 · YODER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1953-10-26512th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HOMESTAKE PROJ EAGLE-ARK (1952-09-22). Immediately behind: OLESON DITCH PUMP AND PL (1954-06-12).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
38753.379191953-10-261958-07-23 44.056.0 CIRRMUNINDFIRDOMPWR 536

Recorded use (last 10 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 332 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 344 AF — 104% of that, and 6th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2015 0 1st lowest of 10 · 0% of median 61 0.0
2016 502 9th lowest of 10 · 151% of median 365 13.2
2017 52 2nd lowest of 10 · 16% of median 364 0.7
2018 214 4th lowest of 10 · 64% of median 364 4.2
2019 1,190 10th lowest of 10 · 358% of median 365 21.3
2020 320 5th lowest of 10 · 96% of median 304 7.8
2021 159 3rd lowest of 10 · 48% of median 131 4.1
2022 380 8th lowest of 10 · 114% of median 162 6.8
2023 372 7th lowest of 10 · 112% of median 176 7.0
2024 344 6th lowest of 10 · 104% of median 154 9.9

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2446 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2015-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.