Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
VVCWD WELL NO R-7
Structure dossier · WDID 3706016 · 2 · GORE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:17 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1963-04-04 — 650th most senior of the 2162 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: VVCWD WELL NO R-2 (1963-04-04). Immediately behind: W B W SPGS AND GATHERING (1963-05-29).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42420.41366 | 1963-04-04 | 1972-05-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDFIRDOM | |
| 45278.0 | 1973-12-19 | 1973-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMINDRECFISDOMOTH | |
| 46020.44792 | 1972-08-20 | 1976-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDRECFIRDOM | |
| 46386.45533 | 1974-08-31 | 1977-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDFIRDOMPWR | |
| 48942.47545 | 1980-03-04 | 1984-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNINDFIRDOMPWR |
Legal record & documents
6 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
94CW0022, 93CW0316, 86CW0072.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
94CW0022 | 2 | 1984-12-31 | S |
93CW0316 | 1 | 1976-12-31 | S |
86CW0072 | 3 | 1973-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 361 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 95 AF — 26% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 361 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 365 | 2.4 |
| 2011 | 305 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 365 | 1.6 |
| 2012 | 361 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 366 | 2.0 |
| 2013 | 367 | 10th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 365 | 2.4 |
| 2014 | 305 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 84% of median | 365 | 1.6 |
| 2015 | 288 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 365 | 0.8 |
| 2016 | 312 | 5th lowest of 15 · 86% of median | 366 | 1.4 |
| 2017 | 384 | 11th lowest of 15 · 106% of median | 365 | 2.3 |
| 2018 | 351 | 7th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 365 | 7.7 |
| 2019 | 405 | 12th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 365 | 3.1 |
| 2020 | 562 | 15th lowest of 15 · 156% of median | 366 | 4.0 |
| 2021 | 415 | 13th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 365 | 2.4 |
| 2022 | 350 | 6th lowest of 15 · 97% of median | 365 | 3.0 |
| 2023 | 440 | 14th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 365 | 3.0 |
| 2024 | 95 | 1st lowest of 15 · 26% of median | 305 | 1.8 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 15 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 5 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 7306 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | continuous | 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2003-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.