← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

FAVRE DOMESTIC PIPELINE

Structure dossier · WDID 3800671 · 4 · BLUE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 04:35 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1912-04-15851st most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FAVRE SPG NO 5 & DITCH (1912-04-07). Immediately behind: FISH PD D & SP 1-4 HGT 2 (1912-04-15).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
37552.22751912-04-151958-06-20 0.50.0 CDOMAUGOTH 649
37552.319991937-08-111958-06-20 0.50.0 CDOMAUGOTH 666

Recorded use (last 8 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 558 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2008, came in at 667 AF — 120% of that, and 7th lowest of the 8 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1974 12 1st lowest of 8 · 2% of median 61 0.1
1975 72 2nd lowest of 8 · 13% of median 365 0.1
1976 151 3rd lowest of 8 · 27% of median 366 0.8
1977 543 4th lowest of 8 · 97% of median 365 0.8
1978 573 5th lowest of 8 · 103% of median 365 1.0
1979 724 8th lowest of 8 · 130% of median 365 1.0
1980 603 6th lowest of 8 · 108% of median 304 1.0
2008 667 7th lowest of 8 · 120% of median 157 2.5

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 2 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2348 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 32% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-2008 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.