← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LUTZ DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3800844 · 1 · SNOWMASS CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:24 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1907-09-03587th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: ALFRED SLOSS NO 2 DITCH (1907-07-01). Immediately behind: SMITH DITCH NO 1 (1910-05-01).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30941.210641907-09-031936-08-25 4.330.0 CIRR 384
61726.615522018-07-102018-12-31 0.00.1 CIRRFIR 384

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 820 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 949 AF — 116% of that, and 10th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1999 552 3rd lowest of 15 · 67% of median 118 2.8
2003 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 2 0.0
2012 157 2nd lowest of 15 · 19% of median 123 1.6
2013 774 7th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 122 3.5
2014 1,198 12th lowest of 15 · 146% of median 134 5.6
2015 820 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 160 2.6
2016 604 4th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 143 2.6
2017 1,039 11th lowest of 15 · 127% of median 165 3.9
2018 699 5th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 147 3.0
2019 724 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 165 3.5
2020 920 9th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 153 3.8
2021 1,293 15th lowest of 15 · 158% of median 162 7.6
2022 1,248 13th lowest of 15 · 152% of median 156 4.6
2023 1,273 14th lowest of 15 · 155% of median 136 6.4
2024 949 10th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 127 4.7

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.