← My Water · Print / save as PDF
NELLIE BIRD DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3800904 · 1 · ROARING FORK RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:51 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1885-06-09 — 501st most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JOHN CERISE DITCH (1885-03-29). Immediately behind: RIC PUMP AND PIPELINE (1885-06-09).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30941.12944 | 1885-06-09 | 1936-08-25 | 3.29 | 0.0 | C | IRRAUG | 281 |
| 52230.50889 | 1989-04-30 | 1993-12-31 | 1.0 | 0.0 | C | OTH | |
| 60630.60141 | 2014-08-29 | 2018-07-26 | 0.5 | 0.61 | C | IRRFISOTH |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,099 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 1,235 AF — 112% of that, and 12th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 451 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 41% of median | — | 119 | 3.0 |
| 2011 | 827 | 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median | — | 151 | 3.5 |
| 2012 | 672 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 61% of median | — | 170 | 3.8 |
| 2013 | 870 | 6th lowest of 15 · 79% of median | — | 175 | 4.1 |
| 2014 | 1,103 | 9th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 136 | 4.9 |
| 2015 | 1,436 | 15th lowest of 15 · 131% of median | — | 236 | 6.2 |
| 2016 | 1,406 | 14th lowest of 15 · 128% of median | 232 | 287 | 4.0 |
| 2017 | 1,207 | 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | — | 244 | 4.5 |
| 2018 | 888 | 7th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 244 | 296 | 4.5 |
| 2019 | 1,099 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 232 | 186 | 4.4 |
| 2020 | 1,260 | 13th lowest of 15 · 115% of median | 270 | 222 | 5.3 |
| 2021 | 775 | 4th lowest of 15 · 70% of median | 270 | 214 | 3.2 |
| 2022 | 335 | 1st lowest of 15 · 30% of median | — | 131 | 3.7 |
| 2023 | 1,232 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 270 | 214 | 6.2 |
| 2024 | 1,235 | 12th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 272 | 214 | 6.4 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.