← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

NORTH SPRING

Structure dossier · WDID 3800910 · 4 · BLUE CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 02:55 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1926-06-01862nd most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: DURANT MINE WTR BEGLEY D (1926-06-01). Immediately behind: BEULAH SPRING & PIPELINE (1931-08-18).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
37552.27911926-06-011958-06-20 0.50.0 CIRR 659

Recorded use (last 13 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 327 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2011, came in at 14 AF — 4% of that, and 1st lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1977 365 13th lowest of 13 · 112% of median 184 1.0
1978 327 6th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 165 1.0
1979 327 6th lowest of 13 · 100% of median 165 1.0
1980 337 8th lowest of 13 · 103% of median 170 1.0
1981 284 4th lowest of 13 · 87% of median 144 1.0
1982 282 3rd lowest of 13 · 86% of median 143 1.0
1983 317 5th lowest of 13 · 97% of median 160 1.0
1984 337 8th lowest of 13 · 103% of median 170 1.0
1985 337 8th lowest of 13 · 103% of median 170 1.0
1986 363 11th lowest of 13 · 111% of median 184 1.0
1987 363 11th lowest of 13 · 111% of median 184 1.0
1999 127 2nd lowest of 13 · 39% of median 216 0.4
2011 14 1st lowest of 13 · 4% of median 36 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2091 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 29% of the irrigation seasons in 1977-2011 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.