← My Water · Print / save as PDF
REDSTONE RANCH DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3800960 · 1 · COAL CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:29 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1902-02-04 — 298th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: CRYSTAL FARM PIPELINE (1901-05-20). Immediately behind: VILLAGE FARM DITCH (1902-03-13).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19684.19027 | 1902-02-04 | 1903-12-28 | 2.5 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 216A |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 42 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2006, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1982 | 536 | 12th lowest of 15 · 1276% of median | 91 | 3.0 |
| 1983 | 547 | 13th lowest of 15 · 1302% of median | 93 | 3.0 |
| 1984 | 649 | 14th lowest of 15 · 1545% of median | 110 | 3.0 |
| 1985 | 375 | 11th lowest of 15 · 893% of median | 65 | 3.0 |
| 1986 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 1995 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 1996 | 42 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 73 | 0.3 |
| 1997 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 1998 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 1999 | 28 | 7th lowest of 15 · 67% of median | 97 | 0.2 |
| 2000 | 731 | 15th lowest of 15 · 1740% of median | 213 | 2.5 |
| 2003 | 94 | 9th lowest of 15 · 224% of median | 96 | 0.5 |
| 2004 | 144 | 10th lowest of 15 · 343% of median | 149 | 2.0 |
| 2005 | 7 | 6th lowest of 15 · 17% of median | 38 | 0.1 |
| 2006 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.