← My Water · Print / save as PDF
WARD DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3801071 · 1 · THREEMILE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:43 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1898-05-01 — 331st most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FRIELER DITCH, CHRISTINE ENLRG (1905-09-04). Immediately behind: REYNOLDS DITCH (1903-07-19).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21521.17653 | 1898-05-01 | 1908-12-04 | 0.06 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOM | 212AA |
Recorded use (last 13 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 43 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1994, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 13 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 10 | 2nd lowest of 13 · 23% of median | 50 | 0.1 |
| 1975 | 59 | 10th lowest of 13 · 137% of median | 149 | 0.2 |
| 1976 | 36 | 6th lowest of 13 · 84% of median | 184 | 0.1 |
| 1977 | 22 | 5th lowest of 13 · 51% of median | 184 | 0.1 |
| 1978 | 18 | 3rd lowest of 13 · 42% of median | 153 | 0.1 |
| 1979 | 18 | 3rd lowest of 13 · 42% of median | 153 | 0.1 |
| 1980 | 61 | 11th lowest of 13 · 142% of median | 153 | 0.2 |
| 1981 | 48 | 8th lowest of 13 · 112% of median | 122 | 0.2 |
| 1982 | 48 | 8th lowest of 13 · 112% of median | 121 | 0.2 |
| 1983 | 61 | 11th lowest of 13 · 142% of median | 153 | 0.2 |
| 1984 | 67 | 13th lowest of 13 · 156% of median | 170 | 0.2 |
| 1985 | 43 | 7th lowest of 13 · 100% of median | 110 | 0.2 |
| 1994 | 0 | 1st lowest of 13 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.