← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

TROY DITCH AND WATER SYSTEM

Structure dossier · WDID 3801201 · 8 · FRYINGPAN RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:07 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1904-05-01548th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TROY DITCH 1ST & 2ND ENL (1904-05-01). Immediately behind: YATES PIPELINE & RES (1904-05-01).

Decreed rights (5)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
30941.198441904-05-011936-08-25 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDFISDOM 353
30941.205741906-05-011936-08-25 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDFISDOM 370
30941.286191928-05-101936-08-25 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDFISDOM 427
37552.337541942-06-011958-06-20 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDFISDOM 669
37552.352451946-07-011958-06-20 0.00.0 CIRRMUNINDFISDOM 673

Recorded use (last 5 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 4,318 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 4,318 AF — 100% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 5 years with a recorded volume.

This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordReleased (AF)Days recordedPeak (cfs)
2007 0 1st lowest of 5 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2021 4,332 4th lowest of 5 · 100% of median 4,332 155 14.3
2022 4,332 4th lowest of 5 · 100% of median 4,332 154 14.3
2023 4,318 2nd lowest of 5 · 100% of median 4,318 154 14.2
2024 4,318 2nd lowest of 5 · 100% of median 4,318 154 14.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 5 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 618 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 17% of the irrigation seasons in 2007-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.