← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

MERRILL DIVERSION

Structure dossier · WDID 3801242 · 1 · BRUSH CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:23 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1883-05-0296th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: FRYING PAN DITCH (1883-04-20). Immediately behind: WALTHEN DITCH (1883-05-10).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12175.01883-05-021889-05-11 0.380.0 CIRR 64
12955.01885-06-201889-05-11 0.530.0 CIRR 127
13305.01886-06-051889-05-11 1.130.0 CIRR 157

Recorded use (last 9 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 40 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 40 AF — 100% of that, and 5th lowest of the 9 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2016 0 1st lowest of 9 · 0% of median 61 0.0
2017 168 9th lowest of 9 · 420% of median 304 0.6
2018 0 1st lowest of 9 · 0% of median 61 0.0
2019 86 6th lowest of 9 · 215% of median 365 0.4
2020 146 8th lowest of 9 · 365% of median 366 0.8
2021 25 3rd lowest of 9 · 62% of median 365 0.3
2022 26 4th lowest of 9 · 65% of median 365 0.2
2023 92 7th lowest of 9 · 230% of median 365 0.4
2024 40 5th lowest of 9 · 100% of median 305 0.2

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 3 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2557 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 100% of the irrigation seasons in 2016-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.