← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SALVATION DITCH VAGN EXT

Structure dossier · WDID 3801661 · 1 · WOODY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 22:26 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1956-05-302257th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MARTINO SPRING (1955-12-31). Immediately behind: SPRING GULCH DITCH (1960-05-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
45655.388661956-05-301975-12-31 15.00.0 CIRR

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 443 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 443 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 325 6th lowest of 15 · 73% of median 49 5.0
2011 793 13th lowest of 15 · 179% of median 147 3.3
2012 172 2nd lowest of 15 · 39% of median 21 5.5
2013 13 1st lowest of 15 · 3% of median 3 3.3
2014 244 3rd lowest of 15 · 55% of median 46 3.0
2015 296 4th lowest of 15 · 67% of median 52 3.3
2016 376 7th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 72 3.4
2017 793 13th lowest of 15 · 179% of median 138 4.4
2018 314 5th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 48 5.4
2019 528 12th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 73 4.6
2020 474 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 64 5.1
2021 495 10th lowest of 15 · 112% of median 53 5.4
2022 862 15th lowest of 15 · 195% of median 102 5.4
2023 527 11th lowest of 15 · 119% of median 67 4.3
2024 443 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 97 2.9

How good is our record of it?

Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 2659 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity sparse 33% of the irrigation seasons in 1987-2024 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.