← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BAILEY BC P&PL
Structure dossier · WDID 3801874 · 8 · ROARING FORK RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 02:58 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1992-01-03 — 3344th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: WILDCAT POND NO 11 (1991-10-01). Immediately behind: BAILEY RF P&PL (1992-01-03).
Decreed rights (2)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 51867.0 | 1992-01-03 | 1992-12-31 | 5.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFIS | |
| 52109.0 | 1992-09-01 | 1992-12-31 | 10.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRRECFIS |
Legal record & documents
3 decreed actions on record across
3 court cases:
94CW0304, 92CW0309, 92CW0215.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
94CW0304 | 1 | 1992-12-31 | S |
92CW0309 | 1 | 1992-12-31 | S |
92CW0215 | 1 | 1992-12-31 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 10 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 6,156 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 6,050 AF — 98% of that, and 5th lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1995 | 1,815 | 3rd lowest of 10 · 30% of median | 61 | 15.0 |
| 1996 | 9,818 | 10th lowest of 10 · 160% of median | 331 | 15.0 |
| 1997 | 8,692 | 9th lowest of 10 · 141% of median | 304 | 15.0 |
| 2016 | 708 | 1st lowest of 10 · 12% of median | 42 | 8.5 |
| 2017 | 6,263 | 6th lowest of 10 · 102% of median | 346 | 10.0 |
| 2018 | 6,774 | 7th lowest of 10 · 110% of median | 365 | 10.0 |
| 2019 | 7,240 | 8th lowest of 10 · 118% of median | 365 | 10.0 |
| 2020 | 5,931 | 4th lowest of 10 · 96% of median | 301 | 10.0 |
| 2023 | 1,210 | 2nd lowest of 10 · 20% of median | 61 | 10.0 |
| 2024 | 6,050 | 5th lowest of 10 · 98% of median | 305 | 10.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 10 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 2 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 2481 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 40% of the irrigation seasons in 1995-2024 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.