Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
MIN FLOW STAPLETON BROTHERS REACH 3
Structure dossier · WDID 3802053 · R · ROARING FORK RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1904-06-30 — 490th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: MIN FLOW STAPLETON BROTHERS REACH 2 (1904-06-30). Immediately behind: SLOUGH D AND BANNING LAT (1884-05-31).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30523.19904 | 1904-06-30 | 1933-10-16 | 0.89 | 0.0 | C | MIN | 269 |
Recorded use (last 7 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 119 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 119 AF — 100% of that, and 4th lowest of the 7 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 106 | 3rd lowest of 7 · 89% of median | 184 | 0.5 |
| 2019 | 323 | 7th lowest of 7 · 271% of median | 184 | 0.9 |
| 2020 | 29 | 1st lowest of 7 · 24% of median | 184 | 0.1 |
| 2021 | 96 | 2nd lowest of 7 · 81% of median | 184 | 0.4 |
| 2022 | 119 | 4th lowest of 7 · 100% of median | 185 | 0.5 |
| 2023 | 119 | 4th lowest of 7 · 100% of median | 245 | 0.5 |
| 2024 | 119 | 4th lowest of 7 · 100% of median | 305 | 0.5 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.