Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
VAN CLEVE-FISHER RES
Structure dossier · WDID 3803750 · 3 · MESA CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 03:52 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1901-04-27 — 326th most senior of the 4788 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: LIGNITE NO 2 DITCH (1903-05-15). Immediately behind: JACOB DITCH (1895-11-01).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21497.18744 | 1901-04-27 | 1908-11-10 | 553.0 | 0.0 | A | IRR | RES10 |
Legal record & documents
1 decreed actions on record across
1 court case:
CA1297.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
CA1297 | 1 | 1908-11-10 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 10 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 664 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1999, came in at 204 AF — 31% of that, and 2nd lowest of the 10 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1954 | 6 | 1st lowest of 10 · 1% of median | — | 2 | 3.3 |
| 1980 | 1,333 | 10th lowest of 10 · 201% of median | — | 184 | 6.0 |
| 1982 | 635 | 5th lowest of 10 · 96% of median | — | 41 | 8.0 |
| 1983 | 1,238 | 9th lowest of 10 · 187% of median | — | 168 | 8.0 |
| 1984 | 968 | 8th lowest of 10 · 146% of median | — | 62 | 8.0 |
| 1994 | 257 | 3rd lowest of 10 · 39% of median | 250 | 19 | 7.2 |
| 1995 | 915 | 7th lowest of 10 · 138% of median | — | 88 | 15.1 |
| 1996 | 692 | 6th lowest of 10 · 104% of median | — | 95 | 7.1 |
| 1997 | 442 | 4th lowest of 10 · 67% of median | 417 | 142 | 12.0 |
| 1999 | 204 | 2nd lowest of 10 · 31% of median | 191 | 102 | 5.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use shows no clear trend over its last 10 recorded years — which is itself worth knowing.
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (7/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 1 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 903 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | sparse | 9% of the irrigation seasons in 1954-1999 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.