← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HASLEY NO 1 DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 3900581 · 1 · PRETI GULCH · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:13 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1917-10-04213th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: PYEATT AND CLAVEL DITCH (1895-06-01). Immediately behind: WEST FORK DITCH (1903-05-18).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
25554.247481917-10-041920-01-03 0.50.0 CIRR 183

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 84 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1999, came in at 10 AF — 12% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1984 60 4th lowest of 15 · 71% of median 76 0.4
1985 114 11th lowest of 15 · 136% of median 129 0.4
1986 119 13th lowest of 15 · 142% of median 140 0.5
1987 117 12th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 168 0.3
1988 163 15th lowest of 15 · 194% of median 175 0.6
1989 142 14th lowest of 15 · 169% of median 173 0.5
1990 88 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 175 0.3
1991 91 10th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 183 0.2
1992 84 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 170 0.2
1993 63 5th lowest of 15 · 75% of median 160 0.2
1994 75 7th lowest of 15 · 89% of median 191 0.2
1995 69 6th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 173 0.2
1997 38 3rd lowest of 15 · 45% of median 67 0.3
1998 25 2nd lowest of 15 · 30% of median 52 0.3
1999 10 1st lowest of 15 · 12% of median 22 0.2

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.