← My Water · Print / save as PDF
LOWER CACTUS VALLEY DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3900612 · 1 · COLORADO RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:14 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1887-03-23 — 96th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: G E HARRIS DITCH (1887-02-25). Immediately behind: WHITTINGHAM DITCH (1887-04-25).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13596.0 | 1887-03-23 | 1888-05-05 | 3.033 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNAUG | 73 |
| 14147.0 | 1888-09-24 | 1889-05-11 | 50.0 | 0.0 | C | STOIRRMUNCOMINDRECFIRDOMAUG | 142B |
| 57691.0 | 2007-12-14 | 2007-12-31 | 0.0 | 0.0 | C | AUG |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 14,438 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 14,389 AF — 100% of that, and 7th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
This structure records both diversions and reservoir releases — they are separate water movements and are accounted separately below.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Released (AF) | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 14,438 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | — | 182 | 65.5 |
| 2011 | 16,460 | 12th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | — | 190 | 50.3 |
| 2012 | 18,326 | 15th lowest of 15 · 127% of median | 1,133 | 216 | 53.3 |
| 2013 | 18,062 | 14th lowest of 15 · 125% of median | 521 | 210 | 53.0 |
| 2014 | 13,050 | 4th lowest of 15 · 90% of median | — | 184 | 50.8 |
| 2015 | 11,913 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 82% of median | 870 | 200 | 49.7 |
| 2016 | 14,354 | 6th lowest of 15 · 99% of median | 2,039 | 214 | 53.1 |
| 2017 | 12,605 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 87% of median | 622 | 214 | 46.2 |
| 2018 | 15,864 | 10th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 665 | 215 | 49.6 |
| 2019 | 15,815 | 9th lowest of 15 · 110% of median | 601 | 214 | 51.4 |
| 2020 | 13,203 | 5th lowest of 15 · 91% of median | 626 | 214 | 46.9 |
| 2021 | 17,589 | 13th lowest of 15 · 122% of median | 1,818 | 214 | 47.3 |
| 2022 | 8,787 | 1st lowest of 15 · 61% of median | 1,543 | 214 | 49.3 |
| 2023 | 16,018 | 11th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 1,347 | 214 | 44.6 |
| 2024 | 14,389 | 7th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 1,544 | 214 | 41.4 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.