← My Water · Print / save as PDF
OASIS DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 3900632 · 1 · OASIS CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 21:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1882-10-10 — 4th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: RIFLE CREEK CANON DITCH (1882-05-15). Immediately behind: MITCHELL-COOPER D PL AP1 (1882-10-10).
Decreed rights (5)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11971.0 | 1882-10-10 | 1889-05-11 | 1.6 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMDOM | 3 |
| 12571.0 | 1884-06-01 | 1889-05-11 | 1.35 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMDOM | 26 |
| 16765.16387 | 1894-11-12 | 1895-12-07 | 0.3 | 0.0 | C | IRRMUNCOMDOM | 154 |
| 23051.22522 | 1911-08-31 | 1913-06-28 | 0.1 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 179A |
| 33864.0 | 1942-09-19 | 1943-01-11 | 0.0 | 2.38 | C | IRR | 223 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 121 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2001, came in at 97 AF — 80% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1987 | 283 | 15th lowest of 15 · 234% of median | 200 | 0.9 |
| 1988 | 189 | 13th lowest of 15 · 156% of median | 189 | 0.6 |
| 1989 | 276 | 14th lowest of 15 · 228% of median | 191 | 1.1 |
| 1990 | 135 | 11th lowest of 15 · 112% of median | 177 | 0.4 |
| 1991 | 94 | 2nd lowest of 15 · 78% of median | 94 | 0.5 |
| 1992 | 97 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 182 | 0.3 |
| 1993 | 106 | 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 178 | 0.3 |
| 1994 | 88 | 1st lowest of 15 · 73% of median | 159 | 0.3 |
| 1995 | 106 | 5th lowest of 15 · 88% of median | 168 | 0.4 |
| 1996 | 142 | 12th lowest of 15 · 117% of median | 180 | 1.0 |
| 1997 | 121 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 175 | 0.3 |
| 1998 | 131 | 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 184 | 0.4 |
| 1999 | 131 | 9th lowest of 15 · 108% of median | 184 | 0.4 |
| 2000 | 113 | 7th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 194 | 0.4 |
| 2001 | 97 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median | 163 | 0.3 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.