Hydrohistorian

← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

SILT PIPELINE

Structure dossier · WDID 3900868 · 7 · COLORADO RIVER · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-28 01:19 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1995-08-28 — 1330th most senior of the 1758 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: NIVENS NO 1 DITCH (1995-07-24). Immediately behind: PUMA PAW AUGMENTATION P (1995-12-31).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
53200.01995-08-281995-12-31 0.00.0 CSTOIRRMUNCOMINDFIRDOM

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 229 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2019, came in at 275 AF — 120% of that, and 11th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1993 189 5th lowest of 15 · 82% of median 365 0.4
1994 218 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 304 0.6
1995 25 1st lowest of 15 · 11% of median 61 0.2
1996 184 4th lowest of 15 · 80% of median 366 0.3
1997 217 6th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 365 0.4
1998 229 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 365 0.4
1999 265 9th lowest of 15 · 116% of median 365 0.5
2000 268 10th lowest of 15 · 117% of median 366 0.5
2001 278 12th lowest of 15 · 121% of median 364 0.7
2002 280 13th lowest of 15 · 122% of median 365 0.6
2003 164 3rd lowest of 15 · 72% of median 304 0.3
2016 39 2nd lowest of 15 · 17% of median 61 0.4
2017 334 14th lowest of 15 · 146% of median 365 1.3
2018 401 15th lowest of 15 · 175% of median 365 1.2
2019 275 11th lowest of 15 · 120% of median 304 1.4

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 9120 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 94% of the irrigation seasons in 1974-2019 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.