← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

JAY CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4001004 · 1 · JAY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:25 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1912-04-011434th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: HEDDLES & HOFER WASTE DITCH (1911-11-11). Immediately behind: ROOSEVELT DITCH (1912-05-01).

Decreed rights (3)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
25807.227361912-04-011930-02-10 2.250.0 CIRR G75
57774.02008-03-062008-12-31 2.40.0 CIRR
58438.02009-12-302009-12-31 0.250.0 CSTK

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 60 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2024, came in at 3 AF — 5% of that, and 3rd lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 57 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 51 2.1
2011 181 14th lowest of 15 · 302% of median 66 2.8
2012 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2013 107 10th lowest of 15 · 178% of median 57 2.5
2014 156 12th lowest of 15 · 260% of median 52 2.0
2015 310 15th lowest of 15 · 517% of median 82 3.0
2016 144 11th lowest of 15 · 240% of median 56 3.2
2017 88 9th lowest of 15 · 147% of median 57 0.9
2018 19 4th lowest of 15 · 32% of median 30 0.8
2019 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 4 0.0
2020 60 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 47 1.0
2021 53 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 31 2.1
2022 24 5th lowest of 15 · 40% of median 16 1.2
2023 159 13th lowest of 15 · 265% of median 41 2.0
2024 3 3rd lowest of 15 · 5% of median 16 0.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.