Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
ROOSEVELT DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4000657 · 1 · KISER CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:29 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1912-05-01 — 1435th most senior of the 4661 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JAY CREEK DITCH (1912-04-01). Immediately behind: YOUNGS CREEK FEEDER D (1913-05-07).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25807.22766 | 1912-05-01 | 1930-02-10 | 0.8 | 0.0 | C | IRR | G76 |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 10 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2022, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 27 | 15th lowest of 15 · 270% of median | 53 | 1.0 |
| 2007 | 12 | 9th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 29 | 0.9 |
| 2008 | 22 | 12th lowest of 15 · 220% of median | 61 | 0.4 |
| 2009 | 13 | 10th lowest of 15 · 130% of median | 64 | 0.3 |
| 2010 | 22 | 12th lowest of 15 · 220% of median | 83 | 0.2 |
| 2011 | 24 | 14th lowest of 15 · 240% of median | 60 | 0.5 |
| 2012 | 4 | 7th lowest of 15 · 40% of median | 15 | 0.2 |
| 2013 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2014 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 5 | 0.0 |
| 2015 | 10 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 25 | 0.3 |
| 2016 | 14 | 11th lowest of 15 · 140% of median | 52 | 0.2 |
| 2017 | 1 | 5th lowest of 15 · 10% of median | 7 | 0.1 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2019 | 3 | 6th lowest of 15 · 30% of median | 31 | 0.1 |
| 2022 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.