← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

BALDY DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4100501 · 1 · DRY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:03 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1884-06-2058th most senior of the 1104 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: N.O.K. LAMB DITCH (1884-05-20). Immediately behind: SILVER SPRINGS DITCH (1884-09-23).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12590.01884-06-201890-06-30 30.00.0 CIRR 1, 52

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 475 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 306 AF — 64% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 1,077 13th lowest of 15 · 227% of median 107 10.0
2012 708 12th lowest of 15 · 149% of median 67 7.0
2013 509 9th lowest of 15 · 107% of median 42 9.0
2014 1,279 14th lowest of 15 · 269% of median 81 12.0
2015 1,428 15th lowest of 15 · 301% of median 91 12.0
2016 407 7th lowest of 15 · 86% of median 62 5.0
2017 622 10th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 55 12.0
2018 66 1st lowest of 15 · 14% of median 20 2.8
2019 626 11th lowest of 15 · 132% of median 68 6.8
2020 267 2nd lowest of 15 · 56% of median 41 5.1
2021 274 3rd lowest of 15 · 58% of median 49 5.9
2022 327 5th lowest of 15 · 69% of median 50 6.5
2023 475 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 57 5.4
2024 377 6th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 61 5.7
2025 306 4th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 50 4.5

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.