← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

HEATH DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4100533 · 1 · SPRING CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1885-02-2162nd most senior of the 1104 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SHAVANO VALLEY DITCH (1884-11-21). Immediately behind: WILSON-DAVIS DITCH (1885-03-10).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12836.01885-02-211890-06-30 2.00.0 CIRR 58, 8

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 603 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 1,035 AF — 172% of that, and 15th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2011 688 10th lowest of 15 · 114% of median 147 3.7
2012 511 4th lowest of 15 · 85% of median 133 2.4
2013 245 1st lowest of 15 · 41% of median 73 2.0
2014 249 2nd lowest of 15 · 41% of median 52 2.7
2015 481 3rd lowest of 15 · 80% of median 138 3.9
2016 890 14th lowest of 15 · 148% of median 132 5.9
2017 789 11th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 131 5.9
2018 860 13th lowest of 15 · 143% of median 148 4.1
2019 562 5th lowest of 15 · 93% of median 102 4.1
2020 672 9th lowest of 15 · 111% of median 121 4.5
2021 574 7th lowest of 15 · 95% of median 85 4.2
2022 568 6th lowest of 15 · 94% of median 112 3.2
2023 603 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 89 4.2
2024 811 12th lowest of 15 · 134% of median 127 4.1
2025 1,035 15th lowest of 15 · 172% of median 155 5.7

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.