← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

UNCOMPAHGRE CEDAR CR D

Structure dossier · WDID 4100571 · 1 · CEDAR CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:02 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1883-12-1342nd most senior of the 1104 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: BUCKHORN DITCH (1883-12-10). Immediately behind: A M H LATERAL (1883-12-13).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
12400.01883-12-131890-06-30 29.10.0 CIRRDOMSTK 1, 40

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 4,863 AF. Its most recent year on record, 1988, came in at 2,755 AF — 57% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1970 4,209 7th lowest of 15 · 87% of median 365 6.0
1971 1,870 2nd lowest of 15 · 38% of median 153 8.0
1972 2,233 4th lowest of 15 · 46% of median 157 8.0
1973 1,904 3rd lowest of 15 · 39% of median 161 6.0
1974 3,618 6th lowest of 15 · 74% of median 304 6.0
1978 7,556 10th lowest of 15 · 155% of median 198 34.0
1979 9,819 13th lowest of 15 · 202% of median 256 35.0
1980 9,004 11th lowest of 15 · 185% of median 297 28.0
1981 11,450 15th lowest of 15 · 236% of median 260 41.0
1983 9,967 14th lowest of 15 · 205% of median 214 28.0
1984 9,447 12th lowest of 15 · 194% of median 108 44.1
1985 621 1st lowest of 15 · 13% of median 93 4.2
1986 6,365 9th lowest of 15 · 131% of median 122 58.0
1987 4,863 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 140 31.0
1988 2,755 5th lowest of 15 · 57% of median 90 28.1

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.