Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
UNCOMPAHGRE (LOUTSENHIZE
Structure dossier · WDID 4101233 · 1 · UNCOMPAHGRE RIVER · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 22:08 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (2deb1d7) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1882-02-23 — 14th most senior of the 1104 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: EAGLE DITCH, STEPHENS PIT ALT PT (1882-02-10). Immediately behind: CHIPETA BEAUDRY DITCH (1882-03-01).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11742.0 | 1882-02-23 | 1890-06-30 | 18.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOMSTK | 10, 9 |
| 12107.0 | 1883-02-23 | 1890-06-30 | 30.0 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOMSTK | 23, 29 |
| 14198.0 | 1888-11-14 | 1890-06-30 | 33.6 | 0.0 | C | IRRDOMSTK | 101, 52, 5 |
Legal record & documents
20 decreed actions on record across
5 court cases:
W1848, CA8038, CA6982, CA4573, CA0149.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
W1848 | 1 | 1890-06-30 | O |
CA8038 | 8 | 1890-06-30 | O |
CA6982 | 1 | 1890-06-30 | O |
CA4573 | 5 | 1890-06-30 | O |
CA0149 | 5 | 1890-06-30 | O |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
How good is our record of it?
Grade C (6/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 3 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | absent | no diversion records cached |
| record continuity | unknown | no record span to measure against |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.