Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
BARBOUR NORTH SIDE D
Structure dossier · WDID 4300526 · 1 · MARVINE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-28 00:09 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Where it sits
Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.
Which of its rights are out of priority?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1911-05-15 — 921st most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: GOEDER DITCH (1902-05-10). Immediately behind: LARRY COOK DIVERSION (1913-10-27).
Decreed rights (3)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28350.22414 | 1911-05-15 | 1929-08-19 | 1.25 | 0.0 | C | IRRINDDOM | 289 |
| 36685.0 | 1950-06-10 | 1958-11-26 | 5.45 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 555 |
| 54421.54112 | 1998-02-25 | 1999-12-31 | 0.3 | 0.0 | C | IRR |
Legal record & documents
6 decreed actions on record across
5 court cases:
99CW0290, 05CW0248, CA0999, CA0980, 98CW0307.
Every case, dated
| Case | Actions | Latest adjudication | Types |
|---|---|---|---|
99CW0290 | 1 | 1999-12-31 | S |
05CW0248 | 1 | 1999-12-31 | S |
CA0999 | 1 | 1958-11-26 | S |
CA0980 | 2 | 1929-08-19 | S |
98CW0307 | 1 | 1923-08-20 | S |
DWR's own records for this structure: net amounts · transactions & adjudication history · scanned decrees (search a case number there for the imaged document). On this site: the district's full legal picture →
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 1,014 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 823 AF — 81% of that, and 5th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1,749 | 15th lowest of 15 · 172% of median | 130 | 8.0 |
| 2009 | 1,222 | 12th lowest of 15 · 120% of median | 92 | 7.0 |
| 2010 | 1,014 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 78 | 7.0 |
| 2011 | 1,152 | 11th lowest of 15 · 114% of median | 86 | 7.0 |
| 2012 | 1,624 | 14th lowest of 15 · 160% of median | 134 | 7.0 |
| 2013 | 1,125 | 10th lowest of 15 · 111% of median | 83 | 7.0 |
| 2014 | 1,432 | 13th lowest of 15 · 141% of median | 103 | 7.2 |
| 2015 | 486 | 3rd lowest of 15 · 48% of median | 47 | 7.0 |
| 2016 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2017 | 653 | 4th lowest of 15 · 64% of median | 67 | 5.9 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2020 | 945 | 6th lowest of 15 · 93% of median | 78 | 6.2 |
| 2023 | 999 | 7th lowest of 15 · 98% of median | 95 | 7.0 |
| 2024 | 1,032 | 9th lowest of 15 · 102% of median | 118 | 6.4 |
| 2025 | 823 | 5th lowest of 15 · 81% of median | 127 | 6.0 |
Trends for this structure
Recorded use is falling over its last 15 recorded years (-40 AF/yr, Mann-Kendall p=0.042).
How good is our record of it?
Grade B (8/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.
The rubric, component by component
| Check | State | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| identity | complete | name, type, and water source all on file |
| decreed rights | on file | 3 right(s), seniority decoded |
| diversion record | present | 5162 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against) |
| record continuity | patchy | 41% of the irrigation seasons in 1966-2025 carry measured days |
| published-record stability | stable | no upstream revisions recorded against this structure |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.