← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

CHERRY CREEK D 1 & 2

Structure dossier · WDID 4300574 · 1 · CHERRY CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 23:10 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1890-10-25608th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SCHNEIDER CK D 1 (1890-07-01). Immediately behind: ROBINSON WARDELL PUMP 1 (1895-11-20).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
19502.149081890-10-251903-10-06 0.50.0 CIRR 136

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 117 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 117 AF — 100% of that, and 8th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2009 362 13th lowest of 15 · 309% of median 365 0.5
2010 158 9th lowest of 15 · 135% of median 167 0.5
2012 28 4th lowest of 15 · 24% of median 51 0.5
2013 25 3rd lowest of 15 · 21% of median 37 0.5
2014 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 5 0.0
2015 36 5th lowest of 15 · 31% of median 61 0.3
2016 218 11th lowest of 15 · 186% of median 366 0.3
2017 228 12th lowest of 15 · 195% of median 365 0.3
2018 163 10th lowest of 15 · 139% of median 304 0.3
2020 12 2nd lowest of 15 · 10% of median 60 0.1
2021 65 6th lowest of 15 · 56% of median 130 0.7
2022 65 6th lowest of 15 · 56% of median 92 0.7
2023 422 14th lowest of 15 · 361% of median 113 1.9
2024 477 15th lowest of 15 · 408% of median 114 2.7
2025 117 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 90 0.7

How good is our record of it?

Grade A (9/10 points) — the components below are the finding; the letter alone is not.

The rubric, component by component
CheckStateDetail
identity complete name, type, and water source all on file
decreed rights on file 1 right(s), seniority decoded
diversion record present 10524 measured days; currency unknown (no data-coverage date to compare against)
record continuity continuous 98% of the irrigation seasons in 1975-2025 carry measured days
published-record stability stable no upstream revisions recorded against this structure

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.