← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

EDMUND PAULS DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4300620 · 1 · SULPHUR CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 20:36 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Which of its rights get called out?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1915-07-21731st most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: B L TAYLOR D NO 1 & 2 (1914-07-12). Immediately behind: WATSON THOMPSON D NO 1 (1917-07-14).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
24365.239421915-07-211917-09-11 0.10.0 CIRRDOM 220

Recorded use (last 14 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 6 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2023, came in at 0 AF — 0% of that, and 1st lowest of the 14 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
1996 29 14th lowest of 14 · 446% of median 148 0.1
1997 17 12th lowest of 14 · 262% of median 86 0.1
1998 4 7th lowest of 14 · 62% of median 111 0.0
1999 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2002 18 13th lowest of 14 · 277% of median 184 0.1
2003 3 6th lowest of 14 · 46% of median 153 0.0
2005 2 5th lowest of 14 · 31% of median 29 0.0
2006 9 8th lowest of 14 · 138% of median 154 0.0
2007 9 8th lowest of 14 · 138% of median 154 0.0
2008 9 8th lowest of 14 · 138% of median 155 0.0
2009 9 8th lowest of 14 · 138% of median 154 0.0
2016 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 6 0.0
2017 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2023 0 1st lowest of 14 · 0% of median 1 0.0

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.