Hydrohistorian
← My Water · Print / save as PDF
JANES DITCH
Structure dossier · WDID 4300719 · 1 · PICEANCE CREEK · DWR record
Where this page's figures come from
Generated 2026-08-27 20:34 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.
Which of its rights get called out?
Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.
Where it sits in line
Priority 1888-04-15 — 587th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..
Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: SEVEN J 7 WESTSIDE D. (1893-07-01). Immediately behind: REDDIN DITCH (1890-04-15).
Decreed rights (1)
| Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. | AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. | AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. | AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. | ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. | Units | UsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on. | Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18173.13985 | 1888-04-15 | 1900-10-03 | 0.4 | 0.0 | C | IRR | 115A |
Recorded use (last 15 years on record)
In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 6 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 3 AF — 50% of that, and 6th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.
| Year | Diverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.) | Compared with its own record | Days recorded | Peak (cfs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 41 | 10th lowest of 15 · 683% of median | 105 | 0.4 |
| 2011 | 155 | 13th lowest of 15 · 2583% of median | 103 | 1.0 |
| 2013 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 6 | 0.0 |
| 2014 | 6 | 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median | 7 | 0.5 |
| 2015 | 643 | 15th lowest of 15 · 10717% of median | 166 | 2.0 |
| 2016 | 98 | 12th lowest of 15 · 1633% of median | 32 | 1.6 |
| 2017 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2018 | 5 | 7th lowest of 15 · 83% of median | 18 | 0.3 |
| 2019 | 189 | 14th lowest of 15 · 3150% of median | 65 | 4.0 |
| 2020 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 1 | 0.0 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 2 | 0.0 |
| 2022 | 22 | 9th lowest of 15 · 367% of median | 10 | 1.4 |
| 2023 | 0 | 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median | 3 | 0.0 |
| 2024 | 41 | 10th lowest of 15 · 683% of median | 63 | 0.4 |
| 2025 | 3 | 6th lowest of 15 · 50% of median | 11 | 0.2 |
Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.