← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

KISSINGER DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4300749 · 1 · LITTLE BEAVER CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:04 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1906-04-21709th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: JOHN QUINTON DITCH (1903-11-08). Immediately behind: DOUGHTY DITCH (1909-04-17).

Decreed rights (1)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
23257.205641906-04-211913-09-06 2.00.0 CIRR 206

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 69 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 29 AF — 42% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 178 12th lowest of 15 · 258% of median 121 2.0
2011 75 9th lowest of 15 · 109% of median 26 2.0
2012 12 2nd lowest of 15 · 17% of median 12 2.0
2013 43 5th lowest of 15 · 62% of median 66 0.5
2014 230 14th lowest of 15 · 333% of median 144 2.0
2015 68 7th lowest of 15 · 99% of median 29 1.5
2016 61 6th lowest of 15 · 88% of median 54 0.6
2017 172 11th lowest of 15 · 249% of median 68 1.7
2018 69 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 39 0.9
2019 97 10th lowest of 15 · 141% of median 46 1.1
2020 16 3rd lowest of 15 · 23% of median 23 0.4
2022 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2023 212 13th lowest of 15 · 307% of median 37 3.8
2024 466 15th lowest of 15 · 675% of median 42 7.4
2025 29 4th lowest of 15 · 42% of median 15 1.7

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.