← My Water  ·  Print / save as PDF

LYNX CREEK DITCH

Structure dossier · WDID 4300780 · 1 · LYNX CREEK · DWR record

Where this page's figures come from

Generated 2026-08-27 21:18 by Hydrohistorian. Sources: DWR HydroBase snapshot HydroBase_CO_20260707 (history) + CDSS REST (current), USGS NWIS cross-checks. Engine v0.5.0 (a1c9146) — every figure regenerates from this named code version and data image.

Where it sits

Location as DWR records it. Faint dots are the neighbouring water; click any to open it.

Which of its rights are out of priority?

Not computable for this structure: this structure is not on the modelled flow network, so no reference gage can honestly stand in for it.

Where it sits in line

Priority 1901-05-01959th most senior of the 3293 structures with decreed rights in this water districtDWR's administrative subdivision of a river basin; the unit calls are usually stated in..

Under prior appropriationColorado's rule for sharing water: first in time, first in right. Age decides, not proximity or need., everything ahead of it in this line is satisfied in full before it receives any water. Immediately ahead: TUCKER WELL (1931-05-31). Immediately behind: BEAR CREEK DITCH (1903-10-15).

Decreed rights (2)

Admin noDWR's numeric encoding of a water right's seniority. Smaller is more senior; the integer part counts days from 1849-12-31 to the date that ranks the right. AppropriatedWhen water was first put to beneficial use. It sets seniority unless a prior adjudication date is later. AdjudicatedWhen the water court confirmed the right. A use decreed in 1975 was not a decreed use in 1955, however old the appropriation is. AbsoluteA right actually put to use, as opposed to conditional -- a placeholder for a use not yet made. ConditionalA right reserving a place in line for a use not yet made; it must be diligently pursued or it lapses. UnitsUsesWhat the court said this water may be used for -- irrigation, municipal supply, augmentation and so on.Case
29813.187481901-05-011932-08-15 2.260.0 CIRR 322
32172.187791901-06-011942-05-26 2.390.0 CIRR 394

Recorded use (last 15 years on record)

In a median year this structure has a recorded diversion of 249 AF. Its most recent year on record, 2025, came in at 131 AF — 53% of that, and 4th lowest of the 15 years with a recorded volume.

YearDiverted (AFA volume: one acre covered a foot deep, about 326,000 gallons -- roughly a suburban household's outdoor use for a year.)Compared with its own recordDays recordedPeak (cfs)
2010 437 14th lowest of 15 · 176% of median 140 4.7
2011 742 15th lowest of 15 · 298% of median 144 5.7
2012 249 8th lowest of 15 · 100% of median 163 0.9
2013 396 13th lowest of 15 · 159% of median 180 2.5
2014 261 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 207 0.8
2015 82 3rd lowest of 15 · 33% of median 60 1.4
2016 270 12th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 71 2.6
2017 269 11th lowest of 15 · 108% of median 110 1.9
2018 0 1st lowest of 15 · 0% of median 1 0.0
2020 261 9th lowest of 15 · 105% of median 134 1.0
2021 170 6th lowest of 15 · 68% of median 131 1.8
2022 158 5th lowest of 15 · 64% of median 124 0.7
2023 58 2nd lowest of 15 · 23% of median 32 1.6
2024 196 7th lowest of 15 · 79% of median 97 2.0
2025 131 4th lowest of 15 · 53% of median 121 0.7

Advisory reading aid on public data — not an administrative or legal conclusion, not a title opinion, and not a substitute for DWR administration or an engineer's analysis. Methodology review status is disclosed at hydrohistorian's basin pages.